Sunday, September 07, 2008

A Change of Mind

Today’s Silly SciFi Summary courtesy of my Sci-Fi box set poses important questions about an issue of crucial importance in the 2008 Presidential election: brain transplants.

Previous movies in this series are:
The Amazing Transparent Man
She Gods of Shark Reef
Moon of the Wolf
Santa Claus Conquers the Martians
Queen of the Amazons
The Incredible Petrified World

The Atomic Brain (aka Monstrosity) (1964)
Auteur/Perpetrator:
Joseph V. Mascelli
Star of Shame: None to speak of
Monster(s): Creepy old woman; feral creature that resembles Stephen Stills; vaguely Hispanic woman with the brain of a cat

Called Monstrosity in its original theatrical release (and one uses the word “theatrical” advisedly), it was retitled The Atomic Brain for subsequent TV and video infliction— I mean, releases. Putting the word “atomic” in any title in the 1950s and 60s was a surefire way to tap into both Cold War fears of nuclear destruction as well as fears of science getting up to not-at-all-good things. The Atomic Brain, though, is less about either of those things than it is kind of a creepy middle-aged male fantasy. Or female nightmare. Or feline horror (there are certain scenes in this movie that would be utterly terrifying to any cats in the audience.)

This movie was also done on Mystery Science Theater 3000.

The movie certainly opens abruptly! Less than a second into it, we are asked, “Can death be outwitted?” Certainly not at chess, as Ingmar Bergman could tell you, although I always thought that if I challenged Death to a game of Scrabble I’d have a fighting chance. But what does that have to do with atomic brains? We are told about how medical science patches up and heals injured people (and the narrator makes this sound like a bad thing)—but “is the transplantation of the human brain the next step?” As it turns out, scientists say yes, but then the narrator goes off on a tangent about “blood-sucking vampires.” A bit of a leap from one to the other, I should think.

In the background, we see Dr. Frank (not Dr. Frankenstein, I hasten to add) puttering around in his lab. I wonder if he is really Dr. Konstantin Frank,* before he got into winemaking. But I digress. Back to the blood-sucking vampires... “Is man now doomed to produce a race of ever-living monstrosities?” I would say yes, but then I’ve been to South Florida. And now we get to the premise of the movie: will rich old people steal the bodies of the young and transplant their brains into them and live forever? Young people, of course, live forever. They never become old; no, not at all. But, okay, I’ll grant the premise. Do go on. “Such questions may see fanciful”—or downright goofy—“but at this very moment, scientists are working on the answers to brain transplantation...and human bodies are used.” They are? (The scary thing is that the religious right thinks that this is exactly what scientists are actually up to!)

We are introduced to Dr. Otto (not Konstantin) Frank and his latest victim—er, patient: a young girl who had recently died and whose body had been stolen. We are told that Dr. Frank transplanted an animal’s brain into her body. What animal? A dog? A cow? A ring-tailed lemur? A spider? Who knows, but it might make a difference. Fortunately, she was just the right height so that the metal support straps cover up her naughty bits. “The brain cells are being reactivated by an atomic fission.” Well, that explains the title of the movie, but—huh? “Has he found a way to outwit death?” Good question.

We then cut to a cemetery, and the night watchman (in a cemetery?) is making his rounds. Dr. Frank needs another body, so he breaks into a vault using a sledgehammer and chisel. As it turns out, he has the physical strength of a two-year-old so it takes rather a while. The watchman sneaks out his bottle (of course) and is easily overpowered by Dr. Frank’s pet/bodyguard/goon Hans, who is one of Dr. Frank’s failed experiments but, as MST3K pointed out, is a dead ringer for Stephen Stills. The narrator expresses wonder about the “monstrosity.” Well, what was anyone expecting? If you transplant an animal’s brain into a human body, what do you think is going to happen? That the result will be able to solve quadratic equations and join Mensa? Jeez. Talk about unreasonable expectations.

Meanwhile, “Inside the vault, a body waits.” Well, there’s probably little else it would be doing. Stephen Stills takes the body back to the car. Well, he’s handy to have around, at any rate. And probably easier to manage than graduate assistants.

The car returns to a large mansion, conveniently located a short drive from the cemetery. Dr. Frank pushes the button to open the glove compartment and the automatic gate slides open. To open the glove compartment, does he need to use his garage door remote? Another experiment that failed, I suspect.

It turns out that Dr. Frank’s lab is below the mansion, and the new body is brought down for another transplant. The narrator expresses concern that brain tissue in dead bodies decays rapidly; “where are the live, fresh bodies he was promised?” Surely FedEx gave him a tracking number. The narrator is also pissed about the fact that all his scientific research has to be conducted at the whim of “a miserly old woman brooding upstairs in her bedroom.” You know, this is the weirdest adaptation of Great Expectations I’ve ever seen.

We then cut to the crotchety old Mrs. March, the rich old miseress herself, played by Marjorie Eaton. Marjorie Eaton, IMDb tells us, had a long distinguished career playing mostly uncredited old women. Here, she gets her star turn. And it is very upsetting. The narrator has mixed feelings about her and her money, “Money horded through a long greedy lifetime, each day more money, each day death getting closer. Ah, but to start life again in a brand new body, beautiful and young.” But wasn’t she at one time young (you would think so) so logically at some point she will arrive back at the same place. Ah, but there are other issues going on: “Hasn’t everyone tried to cheat her? Wanting her money while they smiled at her ugliness?” That does kind of sum up our economy as whole, if you think about it. Then we are introduced to Victor, “this old fool.” Boy, for a narrator, he’s certainly judgmental.

Mrs. March and Victor are evaluating the girls they have “hired” and who are due shortly. “Pleasing personality,” scoffs Mrs. March, “whatever that might mean.” It certainly is a foreign concept to her. Maybe the problem isn’t her oldness.

On the radio, KPLOT breaks in with a news announcement about a body being stolen from the cemetery.

Down in the lab, Dr. Frank has strapped the new body into his atom brain thingie—the metal straps also hide her naughty bits. Boy, I guess every woman in that town is the same height.

Mrs. March and Victor pay a visit to the lab. “The bodies must be fresh,” says Dr. Frank. Well, don’t say “hi.” Dr. Frank also points out that if the police shows up, he has a special button that will set off a nuclear explosion. A what?! Uh, isn’t that a bit of overkill? (And I think you can pretty much anticipate the end of the movie. Although, even at only 10 minutes in, I’m already anticipating the end of the movie. Badly.) When Mrs. March hears of this she says, “Be careful!” Ya think? They watch as the dead girl is reanimated. “She lacks one thing: a brain,” says Dr. Frank. Oh, who needs one of those? They’re more trouble than they’re worth a lot of the time. Victor, like a dork, taps on the glass, as if she were a fish in an aquarium.

Then, suddenly, terror! Horror! Oh, never mind; it’s just a Pan Am flight landing. Sorry; I have a perfectly rational fear of airlines.

At LAX, we are introduced to three young women, who are accompanied by some of the goofiest music cues in the history of movie soundtracks. One buxom blonde apparently has a xylophone in her underpants, which plays in time to the movement of her buttocks. Whatever meager shred of dignity this movie may have had (and it had none) is now gone forever. Her name is Bea and she is supposed to be British, although her unaccountably vaguely Australian accent sounds like someone doing a bad imitation of a Foster’s beer commercial. She sits down next to Nina (pronounced Nyna, for reasons passing understanding), who is supposed to be Austrian (certainly not conveyed through her accent, which only kicks in about every third sentence). Then Anita wanders over and says “Por favor, I no speak anglays very good. ” Oh, please kill me. (On the plus side, one can imagine Lou Dobbs’ head exploding, which is the only way of getting through this scene.) It turns out that the three of them have been hired as “foreign domestics” (huh?) by Mrs. March. Victor turns up to drive them back to the mansion. Victor has trouble pronouncing Anita’s last name (Gonzales). He lives in Southern California and he can’t pronounce the name Gonzales? He should get out of that mansion once in a while.

Now things start to take a creepy turn. “Three new bodies,” says the narrator. “Three fresh new bodies. No families or friends within thousands of miles. No one to ask embarrassing questions when they disappear.” Yeah, those crazy Europeans, not caring when young women go missing overseas. “Victor wondered which one Mrs. March would pick....Victor knew his pick, but he still felt uneasy. Making love to an 80-year-old woman in the body of a 20-year-old girl was insanity.” Ewwww!!!!! That’s what this is about? I need a shower. Yes: Mrs. March planned to have her brain implanted into one of the young girls, and she intended to transfer her fortune to the one she selected (that is, to herself). Victor, apparently in love with Mrs. March (but why?), was looking forward to a best of both worlds scenario—if that’s the best term for it. “It was unpleasant to think what was going to happen to these girls, but a man has to consider his own future.” I’m guessing the theater’s concession stand did not do a brisk business while this movie was playing.

They pull up in front of the mansion. Bea asks, “Aren’t there any nybors?” That accent has got to go. There are no other servants, but, Victor says, “I don’t think you’ll find it boring.” Meanwhile, Stephen Stills prowls the yard and looks on...

They enter the house; “What a jolly little plyce this is,” says Bea, so not British.

Anita sees Stephen Stills peering in the window and screams, although David Crosby would actually be scarier. Everyone ignores her.

They go upstairs and are introduced to their boss. Mrs. March takes great delight in ogling the women and poking their butts with a cane, and it is creepier than you could ever imagine.

Victor goes down to the lab to get Dr. Frank. The brainless woman is wandering around (huh?) loose (if she has no brain, then how...oh, never mind). The narrator tells us, “As with the other bodies stolen from cemeteries, the nerve endings of the brain were too far gone to receive a proper transplant. The experiment had failed to produce anything more than a walking, breathing, zombie-like creature.” Sarah Palin? “But the doctor permitted her to walk around the laboratory. She was quite harmless and at times even...quite amusing.” I am so happy that the movie does not elaborate, as there is already an all-you-can-eat buffet of loathsomeness here. “She doesn’t need to have a brain,” muses Victor. “There could be advantages.” Ewwww!!!!!

Dr. Frank is ordered to give the girls an examination, and the girls begin to get suspicious that they are not mere domestic help. What tipped you off? The job interview in your underwear, maybe? Mrs. March yells at Victor, “Have you disconnected the phones? Can’t I depend on you for anything?” Buy, I can see why she appeals to him.

During the exam, it is discovered that Anita has a big birthmark in the shape of West Virginia on her back. “Hideous,” says Mrs. March. “She’s useless. Do anything you want with her.” The other two are “perfect medical specimens.” Outside, Stephen Stills howls.

Nina in her not-Austrian accent tries to quit. Mrs. March does not let her. Victor wanders in while they are half-undressed and makes some sort of disturbing guttural noise that sounds like someone backing a car over a goat. It is the most pleasant thing to come out of Victor’s mouth, actually, especially when he inexplicably offers his congratulations to the girls, who are starting to catch on that something is weird.

Victor, speaking of old goats, shows Bea to her room. The xylophone is still in her underpants, and it makes a strange plinking arpeggio as Nina slides across the bed. Anita’s bedroom is in the basement, while Nina’s is at the top of the house. “I’ll have to show you,” says Victor. Of course he will.

Bea tries to use a wall phone to make a call, but it doesn’t work. So I guess the March house uses Verizon.

Later that night, Anita is in bed, and hears a weird tapping noise. She opens her door, and, as she screams, we zoom into her teeth and cut to black.

The next morning, Bea and Nina are polishing the silver (if not their accents) and musing on what happened to Anita. “I don’t blyme her for not wanting to sleep in the bysement.” Could she please not talk? Mrs. March shows up and yells at them not to polish the silver as it will stain their hands. They are also told that Anita has left during the night. Later, Bea is castigated for walking up stairs; “those pretty legs will get ugly muscle.” It’s a weird management style.

Nina intercepts Bea at the bottom of the stairs. “Become with me,” she says. Huh? Become what? Oh: “Bea, come with me.” You know, commas exist for a reason.

They—and their weird, freakish music cues—sneak down into the bysement—er, the basement. (Now she’s got me doing it.) They discover that Anita’s clothes are still in her room. “Why would she leave without her clothes?” Have you seen her clothes? They then jimmy open a door; Dr. Frank, whose lab is down the hall, hears something, and wanders out to investigate, clutching a cat. But the girls are gone. Why is he clutching a cat? Oh, now things start to get really upsetting.

The narrator tells us that the doctor’s most important experiment is about to take place, and the grafting will take place with a living breathing human body. That is, Anita’s. “And the brain would come from the doctor’s favorite cat.” (Now this is turning into a Lou Dobbs fantasy.)

Upstairs, Bea is packing. Nina comes by and they decide to somehow flee the house. The soft, almost silent closing of a suitcase catches Mrs. March’s attention through two closed doors and a long hallway. Mrs. March gets up and walks slowly down the stairs, the oboe simulating the sound her joints must be making. (Who the heck is the music editor for this movie?!) She creeps down to the basement and finds the jimmied door and evidence that it had been the girls. As it turns out the girls are right behind her. They quickly run in the other direction.
Meanwhile, Mrs. March struggles back upstairs and locks Bea and Nina in a room.

Victor comes back and tells Mrs. March that she has an appointment to see their lawyer in the morning to change her will. She yells at him for taking so long. Yes, she is one hot mama.
They go down to lab to see what the doctor has been working on and...OH MY GOD!!! Yes, the cat’s brain was successfully transplanted into Anita’s skull—I’m guessing he had to use no small amount of those styrofoam packing noodles or something since a cat’s brain is pretty small compared to a human skull. Mrs. March is horrified. “Does she have all the instincts of a cat?” Is that really the first question that pops into your mind? Dr. Frank demonstrates, and Anita successfully captures, kills, and eats a mouse. I personally don’t want to see the litter box.

While the doctor had been busy doing upsetting things with a vaguely Mexican girl and a cat, the brainless woman ambles outside and is mauled and killed by Stephen Stills. The grisly tableau is watched from the upstairs window by the girls. For some reason, even though the girls are three floors higher than the underground, concrete-lined lab, Dr. Frank can hear Nina yell “Somebody help her!” He runs out and chains Stephen Stills to a tree, which is reminiscent of the most recent Crosby, Stills, and Nash tour.

Later, the girls serve Mrs. March, Victor, and the doctor dinner and, in the kitchen, plot their escape. Bea will attempt to seduce Victor (like that will be difficult). She will then get the car keys. Bea finds Victor in the study having a nightcap (following all his daycaps, I guess). They go for a quiet romantic walk outside past the chained up, hideously mutated creature. While they are having a tender moment in the bushes, Mrs. March calls to Victor, and he goes back to the house. Bea wanders over to a gazebo and sees Anita hanging from the top—do cats climb up concrete and iron gazebos? Someone has apparently confused cats with monkeys. Anyway, Anita scratches out Bea’s eye.

In the blink of an eye (so to speak), Anita is on the roof the house somehow. Nina opens the window and looks up and sees Anita peering over the eave. Nina runs up to the roof to help her. Trying to get down, Anita plummets to her doom (actually, she falls quite gently to her doom).

Now the wheels are really coming off the wagon, and they hadn’t been screwed on too tightly to begin with. In the lab, Dr. Frank is treating Bea while Mrs. March and Victor look on. He holds up her eye in his hand, “Astonishingly complex isn’t it, the human eye.” Could you be more creepy, please? Nina bursts in, is shocked by seeing Bea with an eye missing, and she then tells them that Anita is dead. Dr. Frank runs out. Nina is pissed; she orders Mrs. March and Victor from the lab, and oddly they obey. Dr. Frank returns and says that his prognosis for Bea is good. “I’ve preserved the eye. Let me show you...” No! “She is a very lucky girl,” says Dr. Frank. “Do you think that ironical?” Ironical? Dr. Frank then expresses his sour grapes that other doctors have won Nobel Prizes, while he is stuck in a crazy old lady’s basement because she is the only one “who can supply me with the funds I need to continue my work.” Nina is not impressed.

Bea wakes up and freaks out when she realizes what has happened.

The next day, Victor and Mrs. March return from a day of shopping for Nina’s/Mrs. March’s new wardrobe. They have also made a hair appointment...in Nina’s name. Later, Nina tries on the new clothes while Mrs. March ogles. The narrator reminds us, “the stupid girl wasn’t just modeling Mrs. March’s future wardrobe...but Mrs. March’s future body. So round, so nicely rounded in places that men like.” Sounds like an old Lucky Strikes commercial. Oh, and what a surprise, lecherous old Victor bursts in without knocking. “Don’t stop your style show on my account.” Oh, I think they should.

And now the gloves come off: Mrs. March tells Victor point blank that he is no longer needed. “You are no longer needed,” she says, “close the door on your way out.” “So I’m no longer needed at all, is that what you’re saying?” Um, yes; which word did you not understand? Victor hints that something macabre is about to happen, and Nina catches it. She is curious. Victor slinks out. You think he’s gonna drink?

Yep, sure enough, he is in the study downing what looks like a bottle of A1 Steak Sauce. Nina drops by and asks for clarification to his earlier comment. Victor drunkenly accuses her of being in on a plot to cut him out. Um...by having her own brain removed? He then shows her a press release (press release?) announcing that the March millions will be left to an orphan girl (she’s an orphan?). I guess they’re hoping it’s a slow news day. Victor then adds, “The next press release will be ‘March mansion destroyed by fire.’” Do you really need to send a press release out for something like that? Usually huge mansions that are consumed by fire make the news pretty much by themselves. And sending it out before the fire might raise suspicion. She implores him to help her and Bea get away. He agrees, and has her sign something. Then he tells her to go out to the car and wait.

After Nina leaves, it turns out that Mrs. March has been hiding in the drapes and she pops out and stabs him with a knitting needle. Or I think she does. It’s filmed and edited so weirdly that you’re not sure if they’re even on the same set as each other.

Nina then goes to Bea’s room and, suddenly very Austrian, tries to get her to accompany her escape. “Now; I won’t gow.” Still not British. Nina runs back to the study and finds Victor’s body. She screams, more out of relief than terror, I should think. Dr. Frank chloroforms Nina and brings her down to lab. Mrs. March is strapped into the bed next to her, and it looks like it’s showtime. Mrs. March drones on about how because of her hideous old body, “No one ever gave me any attention. Just my money. I never knew what it was like to be loved for myself.” Hadn’t there been by definition a Mr. March? And, hey, what about Victor? He inexplicably had a thing for her and she treated him like crap! “Why did you kill Victor?” asks the doctor. “Victor was a fool.” You know, again, I don’t think the old body was the problem.

All right, we’re in the home stretch here. Mrs. March is anesthetized, and the doctor glances over at where the cat’s brainless body is hanging. He has an idea...

Some time later, Nina wakes up...and she is still Nina. Where is Mrs. March? Her brain has been put...in the body of the cat! (I guess it would have to be really crammed in the cat’s skull.) The doctor says, “You are now a very wealthy woman, Nina.” He wonders how he can keep access to her money. The cat is pissed and immediately scratches the doctor. “Dr. Frank enjoyed this transplantation,” the narrator tells us. Is that a tone of gloating?

Well, Mrs. March gets the last laugh. The cat manages to trap Dr. Frank in his atom brain tube thing and at the same time trigger the nuclear destruct device. So, basically, it’s like any cat. Nina is still strapped to her gurney. Bea, in bed, suspects something is up and staggers out. She pulls her bandage off to reveal an empty eye socket. Thank you, movie. She helps Nina escape. She runs back for her eye, which she spies in a Petri dish. However, her depth perception is obviously not what it used to be, and she blunders into a piece of machinery and is electrocuted before she can get to it. Doh! Nina flees the building just as it is consumed in flames. She wanders away, followed by the cat—that is, Mrs. March. “She would follow that girl. Some time, some place...revenge would come.” How is that gonna happen?

The end.

And that was how Dr. Frank transitioned from transplanting brains to opening a Finger Lakes winery. Boy, Dr. Frank did have a wildly awry moral compass. He said the goal of his research was to save lives, but if you can only transplant brains from one live body into another live body, that kind of means you have one extra brain that has to be disposed of. In other words, someone has to die to save someone else who wasn’t really dead to begin with. It’s probably futile to examine the moral implications of a movie like this too closely, but all brain transplant movies have the same problem. Maybe the goal should be to work on transplanting human brains into animals. But, as Dr. Farnsworth said in Futurama: “Sure everyone’s in favor saving Hitler’s brain. But put in the body of a great white shark, and suddenly you’ve crossed a line.” So maybe we should just all keep our brains to ourselves. Think about it won’t you? Thank you.

*I hasten to point out that I have visited Dr. Frank’s Finger Lakes winery many times and his wines are excellent and having nothing whatsoever to do with transplanted brains.

Thursday, September 04, 2008

Seward's Folly

Someone at AAA is either eerily prescient or has a warped sense of humor. I went out to the mailbox today and Going Places magazine had arrived. What was on the cover but...
I think we could all use Roadside Assistance right about now...

Wednesday, September 03, 2008

Word Press

I have added a new feature to my Web site: a free monthly downloadable crossword puzzle. Check out the debut puzzle here. As always, comments are appreciated.

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

More Blogging

I have now become a more or less regular contributor to WhatTheyThink's PrintCEO blog.
This week, I posted about my recent trip to the Creative Freelancer Conference in Chicago.

Panda Bait

Wha? Yes, for those who think that the only environmentally bad part of a computer is on the outside, Asus
today launched the ASUS Bamboo Series notebook, a groundbreaking bamboo-clad product that is truly green throughout every phase of its life – from its conception, production and use to its eventual recycling and disposal.
The only drawback they don't tell you about is that you will end up being menaced by pandas.

Patently Absurd

Via Engadget, and apparently not an April 1 post, Microsoft has filed for, and received, a patent that "essentially amounts to Page Up / Page Down functionality." That is:
A method and system in a document viewer for scrolling a substantially exact increment in a document, such as one page, regardless of whether the zoom is such that some, all or one page is currently being viewed. In one implementation, pressing a Page Down or Page Up keyboard key/button allows a user to begin at any starting vertical location within a page, and navigate to that same location on the next or previous page. For example, if a user is viewing a page starting in a viewing area from the middle of that page and ending at the bottom, a Page Down command will cause the next page to be shown in the viewing area starting at the middle of the next page and ending at the bottom of the next page. Similar behavior occurs when there is more than one column of pages being displayed in a row.
Now I see no reason to be shy about submitting my patent for "A method and system on a keyboard for turning a lowercase letter into an uppercase letter. In one implementation, pressing a Shift key while simultaneously pressing a letter key causes that letter to appear on screen as a capital letter."

What Would MacGyver Do?

Well, not unsurprisingly, Wikipedia has a list of problems solved by MacGyver.

In Praise of Procrastination

So what happens when you write a book called 100 Things to Do Before You Die and then have actually done all 100 things? Well...
100 Things' author dies at 47
So, I'm in no hurry to do them...

Monday, September 01, 2008

Cute? No, It's Snot

Do you want to revolt family, house guests, or even just yourself? Sure, we all do! Then how about this giant, nose-shaped shower gel dispenser:
If it clogs, you can order a giant bottle of Afrin.

Word Up

OK, you may ask, what have I been reading this summer? Well, glad you asked:

David Copperfield
Charles Dickens
May 2008
Fiction

Perhaps Dickens’ most famous novel—and the one he called his “favourite son”—this is the closest he ever came to autobiography, and even then he changed many things because, as he wrote to his friend John Forster, he was fearful of being too autobiographical. Young David is born shortly after his father has died, and his mother eventually takes up with the abusive Murdstone and his sister Miss Murdstone (wasn't Dickens great with names?). The Murdstones are not especially fond of children, and things come to a head when David bites Murdstone and is eventually sent away to boarding school. And thus begins David’s adventures, which will lead to abject humiliation in a blacking factory (the most autobiographical portion of the book) and his eventual rescue by his eccentric aunt Betsy Trotwood, whose only objection to him was that he was not born a girl. The loquacious Wilkins Micawber, who does a stint in debtor's prison, was a stand-in for Dickens’ father. David eventually finds fame and fortune as a writer. There was an amusing story behind one character; Miss Mowcher, a dwarf-like hairdresser and manicurist for David’s schoolfriend Steerforth, was apparently based on Dickens’ wife’s chiropodist, who after the chapter featuring her appeared (David Copperfield, like all of his books, was published serially in monthly editions), threatened Dickens with legal action. When Mowcher subsequently reappeared in a later chapter, her character had changed somewhat. David Copperfield may not be Dickens’ best novel, but it deserves its high reputation. It was also the point—midway through his bibliography—where he began planning out his books in advance, rather than writing them on-the-fly. David Copperfield was also much lighter in tone than his books would become from here after.

Bleak House
Charles Dickens
May 2008
Fiction

The one. The pinnacle (in my opinion) of Dickens’ career. This epic novel about the British legal system and all its flaws is the best of all his books. The book centers around the Courts of Chancery (well-named, since you “took your chances” in it), and the case of Jarndyce and Jarndyce, a dispute over conflicting wills that has dragged on for years and has become rather infamous. “Jarndyce and Jarndyce has passed into a joke. That's the only good that has ever come of it.” It concerned an inheritance that was gradually being consumed by its own legal fees. The two potential heirs, cousins Ada and Richard, are left in the care of benevolent John Jarndyce, who long ago gave up on the case. With them is the orphan Esther Summerson (who narrates about half the book) whose own lineage turns out to be a surprise to everyone. Meanwhile, the evil lawyer Tulkinghorn has uncovered a secret about Sir Lester Dedlock and Lady Dedlock—and is eventually found murdered. Part social satire, murder mystery (the first in English literature, and Inspector Bucket is an extremely funny character), convoluted legal thriller—Bleak House has it all. Great characters—and I think one of the best books ever written. (Although the scene in which Mr. Krook spontaneously combusts was perhaps a bit much.) Many of the locations in the novel were featured on the Charles Dickens walking tour Steven H. and I took last April in London, so it was cool being able to accurately visualize many of the locations. There was also an excellent BBC production of it that starred Gillian Anderson as Lady Dedlock that is probably the best Dickens adaptation I have ever seen, although like all of them tends to lose a lot of the humor of his prose.

Hard Times
Charles Dickens
June 2008
Fiction

The least subtle of all Dickens’ books (and the shortest), Hard Times is a diatribe against the kind of cold, emotionless, statistics-and-facts-driven social theorists who had emerged following the Industrial Revolution. Thomas Gradgrind, prominent resident (and eventual Member of Parliament) of the northern industrial town of Coketown, opens the book with his lecture to the young students of the Coketown school: “Now, what I want is Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else.” His own children are discouraged from doing anything but studying, and they are strongly reprimanded for playing or going to the circus—or, basically, doing anything fun. Naturally, this turns both his son and daughter into psychological basket cases; his daughter ends up in a loveless marriage to the blowhard banker Mr. Bounderby. (He is described thusly: “He had not much hair. One might have fancied that he had talked it off; and that what was left, all standing up in disorder, was in that condition from being constantly blown about by his windy boastfulness.” Heh.) His bluster about being a self-made man, as it turns out, is all a lie. Gradgrind’s son Tom ends up as a gambler and thief. Hard Times is social commentary with a sledgehammer and while it’s funny and rings true a lot of the time, it suffers from being a bit too “in your face.”

The Physics of the Impossible
Michio Kaku
June 2008
Non-Fiction

Kaku is a physics professor and popular science writer and appears frequently on Discovery and Learning Channel documentaries. He is also a science-fiction fan so has decided to investigate how possible various sci-fi technologies are. Death rays? Transporters? Tractor beams? Faster-than-light travel? Time travel? How far away are we from these things? As it turns out, quite a ways. He organizes the book into Class I, II, and III “impossibilities” (in ascending order of impossibility), and even the most probable of the impossibilities are decades, if not centuries, away. Perhaps discouraging for those who were hoping to experience Star Trek in their lifetimes, still it does provide an excellent look at the current state of the cutting edge of physics research. Even if we won’t be beaming ourselves around any time soon, it’s interesting to know that there is actually fruitful research in “teleportation” going on. It’s a fascinating book, and Kaku does a good job of clearly explaining even the most abstruse physical concepts.

Gulliver’s Travels
Jonathan Swift
June 2008
Fiction

I don’t recall ever having read Gulliver’s Travels before, but my local Barnes & Noble was having a 3-for-2 sale on B&N imprinted classics, so I picked it up and took it away on vacation (appropriately). This is highly unsubtle social satire (some of it a bit too rooted in what was happening politically in Europe in the early 1700s). We all know about Lemuel Gulliver’s travels among the Lilliputians (the tiny people), less so his travels among the Brobdignagians (giant people), the flying island of Laputa, inhabited by pretentious intellectuals (an extremely funny chapter), the noble horse people the Houyhnhms, and the barbarous humans, the Yahoos. Good vacation reading and laugh out loud funny in places.

Dear American Airlines
Jonathan Miles
June 2008
Fiction

I blogged about this excellent book before.

Little Dorritt
Charles Dickens
July 2008
Fiction

After the social satire with a sledgehammer of Hard Times, Dickens returned to form with Little Dorritt. One of the traumas of Dickens’ childhood was seeing his father imprisoned in the Marshalsea Debtors Prison. (There was a tremendous illogic in the laws in Britain at the time where, if someone owed someone else money they could not repay, they were imprisoned—virtually ensuring that they could never work to earn the money to pay those debts. Dickens often pointed out the utter absurdity of these laws.) Debtors prisons thus appeared often in Dickens’ novels, even from the start (Samuel Pickwick in The Pickwick Papers is incarcerated in one). Little Dorritt explicitly looks at the psychology of those imprisoned. William Dorritt is put away in the Marshalsea Prison for 20 years, where he becomes “The Father of the Marshalsea,” earning a place of honor and respect among the inmates and turnkeys. His daughter Amy (the titular “Little Dorritt”) was born while he was an inmate, and has never known life outside the prison, and even though she is free to come and go, she chooses to return to the prison at night. She has a secret day job as a seamstress for the elderly Mrs. Clennam, whose son Arthur (the book’s main protagonist) has just returned from many years abroad. Arthur becomes interested in Little Dorritt and, after some investigation, ultimately manages to secure for William Dorritt an immense inheritance to which he is entitled. Released from the Marshalsea, William Dorritt and family travel around Europe attempting to distance themselves from their past life—not entirely successfully. (The scene where Dorritt has a stroke at a fancy dinner party and imagines himself back in the Marshalsea is completely heartbreaking.) There are also various other plots and admittedly things go a bit overboard toward the end when there is a rather convoluted plot involving evil twins and mistaken identity. Still, this is one of the last great Dickens novels, full of great characterization and social commentary. (The great wealthy capitalist Merdle, before whom everyone bows down, turns out to have been a swindler and forger who ends up being the ruin of many of those who worshipped him.) Oh, and let’s not forget the Barnacles who run the fictional but oh-so-aptly named Circumlocution Office, a government agency specifically designed to ensure that nothing is ever actually accomplished.

A Tale of Two Cities
Charles Dickens
July 2008
Fiction

Dickens only wrote two historical novels and the more famous of the two (A Tale of Two Cities) actually is less successful than the less famous (Barnaby Rudge). A Tale of Two Cities is set during the French Revolution and features the famous opening line “It was the best of times, it was the worst of times” and the famous closing lines “It is a far far better thing I do than I have ever done before...” Charles Darnay, an expatriate Frenchman who has renounced his aristocratic family, now lives in London, choosing to earn a living rather than live as a parasite on the peasantry, which is how he sees his family. He falls in love with and marries Lucy Manette, the daughter of a physician who had been imprisoned in the Bastille for 18 years. Darnay is accused of treason against England, but is acquitted thanks largely to the efforts of his brilliant but drunken lawyer Sydney Carton who, as it turns out, is a dead ringer for Darnay physically. They all end up in Paris at the time the French Revolution and the Reign of Terror break out and Darnay is identified as being a relative of the family of Evremond, against whom the Defarges (including the perennially knitting Madame Defarge) have a specific grudge. Darnay is sentenced to the guillotine—but Carton arranges to swap places with Darnay and sacrifices himself largely for the sake of Lucy Darnay, with whom he is also in love, albeit futilely. Ultimately, A Tale of Two Cities is unsuccessful because the characterizations are not as strong as those in Dickens’ other novels (part of this was due to the short weekly serialization of the novel, which imposed more rigorous plot demands on him than the more leisurely monthly editions he usually published). But at the same time, he oversimplifies the French Revolution; he begins by sympathizing with the peasants and their revolt against an abusive, taxing, and ultimately useless aristocracy but then depicts the Reign of Terror as little more than insensible mob violence (depicted a bit more convincingly in the Gordon Riots scenes in Barnaby Rudge). Still, it’s Dickens, so how bad could it be?

Great Expectations
Charles Dickens
July 2008
Fiction

Widely regarded as Dickens “most perfect” novel, Great Expectations does encapsulate in a comparatively short novel (under 500 pages) all of Dickens’ strengths as a novelist. At the start of the book, orphan Philip Pirrip (Pip) is a small child, playing in the Kent marshes. He encounters an escaped convict and procures him food, which he tries to keep hidden from his abusive older sister (his guardian) and her husband, the simple yet kindly blacksmith Joe Gargery. Some years later, Pip is asked for by the reclusive and decaying Miss Havisham, whose early jilting has resulted in her spending her entire life in a dark house, occasionally wearing a yellowed wedding dress, and visiting the cobwebbed and rat-infested dining room where her wedding feast has been sitting for more than 30 years. Pip is smitten by Estella, Miss Havisham’s adopted daughter, but she deems him “too common.” After several years of his mysterious and bewildering visits to Miss Havisham, Pip comes into a fortune thanks to a mysterious benefactor, and moves to London to become a gentleman, full of great expectations. He distances himself from Joe, believing the blacksmith to be “too common.” Then he finds out who his benefactor really is...and all his expectations are dashed, and he realizes what a schmuck he was in thinking that he was somehow “better” than Joe simply because he had a few more pounds. A very very funny book, full of the characteristic Dickens characterizations and social commentary. If there is one Dickens novel to read (if the 900+-page Bleak House seems too overwhelming), this would be it.

What I Talk About When I Talk About Running
Haruki Murakami
August 2008
Non-Fiction

My favorite contemporary novelist is Japan’s Haruki Murakami, and he just published a short memoir about running. In the mid-1980s, when he first decided to become a novelist (he had previously owned a jazz club in Tokyo), he decided to start running, as well. (There is a connection as both writing and running are notoriously solitary activities.) Even now, in his 50s, he still runs marathons, and much of the book describes his preparing for the New York Marathon. He also reprints an article he wrote about the time he ran the original “marathon”—that is, the route from Athens to Marathon in Greece, when the name and official distance of a marathon derives. It’s a slim book, probably not of much interest to anyone not a Murakami fan, but for those of us who are, it’s a somewhat revealing peek into his life.

Reading the OED
Ammon Shea
August 2008
Non-Fiction

Ammon Shea is a fanatical collector of dictionaries and he decided to spend a year doing something that actually sounds pretty cool: reading the entire 20-volume Oxford English Dictionary. Now, you may ask yourself: why would anyone want to read a book about a guy reading a book? That’s a perfectly fair point, and about as good a point as the question, Why would anyone want to sit down and read the OED from beginning to end anyway? But then I inevitably ask, why would anyone want to watch Survivor, Dancing with the Stars, or any movie that’s playing at the mall, so to each his own.... I actually found Reading the OED very entertaining—not only the author’s struggles to physically read it (he was plagued with headaches throughout the project and at one point finds that he suddenly needs glasses). The trick is not to think of the OED as a dry reference book, but an entertaining history of the English language, which any good dictionary is, really. Words some into fashion, they go out off fashion—some words have only ever appeared in dictionaries and have never been actually seen “in the wild.” The OED is rather like a natural history museum, or a zoo, if you prefer. The bulk of the book (and, unlike the author’s subject, it is not a weighty tome; I finished it in about two hours) comprises highlights from the OED. Very often, the author exults in discovering “I never knew there was a word for that!” Or, every once in a while, “Why on earth is there a word for that?” The poster child for the latter is unbepissed, which means “not having been urinated on.” The author comments, “Who ever thought there would actually be a need for such a word? Is it possible that at some time there was such a profusion of things that had been urinated on that there was a pressing need to distinguish those that had not?” One shudders to think.... Other examples he cites are:
Fornale: to spend one’s money before it has been earned. Kind of the basis for our economy, it seems.

Gove: To stare stupidly. The author notes that every dictionary has defined this word this way, save for Webster’s Third, which defines it as “to stare idly.” Perhaps it is a coincidence that the editor of the Webster’s Third was named Gove...

Hypergelast: A person who will not stop laughing.

Kakistocracy: Government by the worst citizens. No comment...

Marterteral: Having the characteristics or qualities of an aunt. Why avuncular (having the characteristics or qualities of an uncle) is somewhat popular but marterteral passed out of common parlance—and, unlike avuncular, is flagged by Word’s spellchecker—remains a mystery.

Natiform: Buttock-shaped. Ironically, not used as an insult.

Onomatomania: Vexation at being unable to find the right word. We’ve all had this problem at times.

Peristeronic: Suggestive of pigeons. Gotta love it.

Petecure: Modest cooking. That is, more or less the opposite of an epicure.
And my favorite:
Constult: To act stupidly together. For those in my line of work, it’s that first “t” that makes all the difference!
The Magdalen Martyrs
Ken Bruen
August 2008
Fiction

Steven H. sent me a CARE package of books from Britain for my birthday and one of them was The Magdalen Martyrs by Irish author Ken Bruen. It’s of a genre I guess one could call British neo-noir, as it is a modern version of the kind of dark crime novels (featuring a bitter, battle-scarred anti-hero as the detective/narrator) commonly attributed to Raymond Chandler and James M. Cain. Bruen’s anti-hero is alcoholic, drug-addicted former “Guard” (I really don’t know what that is, some kind of Irish police, I suspect) named Jack Taylor. Taylor becomes involved in two cases, one involving tracking down the “angel of the Magdalens”—that is, the person who helped unfortunate girls escape from an abusive Catholic laundry. The other case involves proving that a local businessman's father’s death was not accidental. I can’t say that I ever really cared about either case, as I really disliked the Jack Taylor character and found much of the novel a bit of a bore, as Taylor really did little more than drink and consume enough drugs to kill a medium-sized rhinoceros. Not one of my favorites.

The Devil’s Home on Leave
Derek Raymond
August 2008
Fiction

I read Derek Raymond’s He Died With His Eyes Open last year, and liked it (though not hugely). Steven H. also sent me this one, which I ended up liking more. Raymond is another of the British neo-noir writers, but I like him a lot better than Ken Bruen. (I did have to e-mail Steven H. and ask what certain British slang terms meant! A “grass” or “supergrass” is apparently an informer. So now you know, even if you have never bought a Supergrass album.) The no-name anti-hero is a lot more likable than Bruen’s Jack Taylor, and has more in common with Chandler’s Philip Marlowe. The novel begins with a body being discovered—bled, boiled, cut into several pieces, and placed in plastic shopping bags. (OK, I probably should not have started reading this while eating dinner.) The book is set in the 1980s and as no-name starts investigating, espionage, treason, and people selling out to the Russians come into it. A Defense minister is involved, as is a vicious soldier who was deemed too brutal and violent even for the Army. No-name has is requisite fights with authority and the powers-that-be but turns out right in the end. It’s all rather along the Chandler formula, but then it’s a pretty good formula. (I was reading this in a pub in Chicago after a day of conference sessions, and some folks I had met came in and joined me; they asked me about the book, and I said “It’s rather a British Raymond Chandler.” The response was, “Oh, I don't like spy novels.” Sigh.)

The Blog is Back

After The Industry Measure was shut down last spring, I decided to "chill out" for a while. After many years of being on the treadmill of non-stop reports, weekly e-mail blasts, blogging various places elsewhere, and many many other projects, I was completely burned out. I had becomes less a writer and more a delivery system for words--and I had run out! So I took as much of the summer off as I could to replenish my words. Now, summer is over, and it's back to the salt mines. I shall be attempting to post here more regularly (famous last words), with my usual mix of fiction experiments, summaries of bad science-fiction movies (I have made only the smallest of dents in my 50-film cheesy science fiction DVD collection), and, of course, harbingers of the looming robot holocaust. Consider yourselves warned.

Monday, July 21, 2008

Raman Noodles

I was just at the dentist this morning for my six-month cleaning, and while I confess I have never had the pleasure of experiencing a drill, this seems like a cool idea, although my initial thought upon reading the headline was that the laser would do the "drilling." Not so:
Tooth Lasers Could Make Drilling a Thing of the Past

UK researchers have developed a technology that spots tooth decay before it begins using a technology based on Raman spectroscopy—a method that is currently used to identify chemicals. A new study has determined that harmful bacteria can be detected by analyzing how light is scattered when a laser is fired at the tooth.
"No, Mr. Bond, I want to you rinse!"

This New Thing Called E-Commerce

Says the New York Times:
To Save Gas, Shoppers Stay Home and Click

To go shopping these days, more Americans are trading in their car keys for a keyboard.

Online shopping is gaining at a time when simply filling up a gas tank to head to the mall can seem like a spending spree.
First of all, just about every story about retail shopping trends over the past decade has pretty much used the headline "[Insert reason du jour here], Shoppers Stay Home and Click." That is, e-commerce has been growing steadily anyway for the past 10 years, and high gas prices are just one of many factors contributing to that growth. It's not like e-commerce was on a downward trend. Personally, I hate shopping, and I can never find the things I want in proper stores, so I prefer buying stuff online. In terms of gas, I calculated what it costs to get from my house to the Strip Mall Hell at Exit 15 and it is about $4.50, or what the average shipping cost of something is. So that's a wash, as far as I'm concerned, but I am aware that many people live some distance from shopping. It's entirely possible that shipping costs may rise since UPS and USPS vehicles use, well, gas.

However, the one drawback to e-commerce is that while chains do not lose business, individual shops do, which means layoffs and branch closings, and fewer jobs in a given area, furthering the economic pressures. After all, one of the reasons why these price hikes are so bad is that people's pay has not increased accordingly.

It's funny, though, how in all the discussions of the increasing costs of everything, everyone stresses saving and that the very thought of suggesting that employers pay people more is verboten. Funny, that.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Picture This

Barry Ritholtz, author of one of the blogs I read at least daily, the Big Picture, has looked at the state of the economy today, and is mad as hell and can't take it anymore:
The collection of ne'er do wells, clueless dolts, political hacks, and oh, let's just be blunt and call them what they are -- total Idiots -- expands into an ever larger circle.

While the Republic burns due to the unsavory combination of incompetence, ideological rigidity, and crony capitalism, the fools and assclowns seem ever more determined to avoid any personal responsibility for the damages they have wrought. Instead, they flail about blindly, blaming everything and everyone -- except their own horrific negligence.

This is financial incompetence writ on a scale far grander than anything seen for centuries.

As a nation, our institutions have failed us: Under Alan Greenspan, the Federal Reserve slept through the most reckless and irresponsible expansion of bank lending in history for reasons of ideological purity. His opposition to the Fed’s regulatory role reached the point of malfeasance long ago. History is unlikely to be kind to the Maestro.
...
Go read the rest, and then pick someone you'd like to hit.

Christmas is Coming...

Via Gizmodo, for sale: the typewriter Douglas Adams used to write The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. It is signed and comes with a first edition of Hitchhiker's. Well, for $25,000 it had better come with a first edition book, as well as an Infinite Improbability Drive. Or at the very least a few Pan Galactic Gargle Blasters.

With Six Errors You Get Eggroll

Ah, the perils of automatic transliteration: via Boing Boing, a Chinese Restaurant whose owner had a wee bit of a problem with his translation software:
Be sure to try #404, the File Not Found Chicken.

Heartwarming Gifts

Well, Grandma never knitted like this: woolen organs.

"What did you pick up at the craft fair--Oh my god!!"
I wonder if they can be worn for warmth.

Monday, June 16, 2008

Friday, June 13, 2008

Spanish Fry

Hmm...Spanish children sound remarkably like American adults. But at least children don't drive while yakking.
Spain treats child phone addicts

Experts are concerned by children's increased use of mobile phones

Two children in Spain have been admitted to a mental health institution to be treated for addiction to their mobile phones, Spanish media report.

The children, aged 12 and 13, were sent to the clinic by their parents, who said they could not carry out normal activities without their handsets.

Stimulus Package

Well, you know, a sluggish economy can affect everyone.